What to Do With the Waste On the Way to Trillions

I found the video below interesting in the way it, and it's creators at MAYA Design, provide a perspective of scale in the 'computer age'.

It touches on many issues including the need to change the way we think and act as we pursue being part of the trillions of 'computers'. While I think it fails to really draw some solid conclusions in favor of ending with the concept of "Too much information!" (Hey, we passed that 'millions' ago.), perhaps there are more videos planned to better explore the concept.

However, I was intrigued with the concept of computing as an ecology and the comparison of the trillions of computers to the trillions of cells in the human body. I can't help but take that comparison to the human body a bit further.

As the video points out, nature has solved the problem of trillions. In the comparison, the body has atoms that make up molecules, that make up cells, that make up organs, and those make up systems, etc. What the video fails to point out is that, while the human body has solved it, the history of computing has failed to address the problem of waste.

The human body, when used up and ceases to function, is relatively easily disposable. The human body eventually decays and degrades into organic material that disappears into the natural world. In fact, the only trace of a the body's previous existence is that which we humans have manufactured to surround it…caskets, crypts, clothes…not to mention all the stuff we have left behind.

The waste of the computer age, and it's physical leftovers, is much more difficult to dispose of. In fact, that waste is more pronounced and there is more of it because we dispose of computer related material simply because it becomes 'obsolete', something we don't do with humans. 

CNN recently cited that, according to the United Nations Environment Program, around 20 to 50 million tons of e-waste are generated worldwide each year…and that's at the current level. In 2008 a Greenpeace study, "Not in Our Backyard", found that in Europe
only 25 percent of the e-waste was recycled safely. In the U.S. it is
only 20 percent and in developing countries it is less than one
percent. They go on to estimate that 80 percent of e-waste generated worldwide is not properly recycled

Much of this waste is shipped to developing countries. While some of that waste can be repaired and re-purposed by local traders, most is dumped. In fact, a cottage industry and an associated organized crime element has sprung up around e-waste trading. Also, don't forget the impact on the human and environmental health of our planet. Much of this waste contains toxic materials.

While there has been progress in dealing with this waste, with companies using fewer toxic materials and establishing programs that oversee responsible disposal, there is still a long way to go to protect our natural 'trillions' from our computer 'trillions'. 

There is a responsibility that falls to all of us who use this technology to further our personal and professional gains to know where our "old" technology is going when we are done with it. While dumping our waste on other countries is nothing new, we interactive professionals, "geeks", continue to champion the building of communities connected by technology. We must all remember, as well as also champion the message, to help keep our world-wide community clean.

I Won! I Won!

You know it’s gonna be a good week when you start your day with a win. No, I’m not talking about my fantasy football league. I’m talking about winning something much more useful…


Find more videos like this on Social Media Breakfast – Twin Cities

Julio’s book, Twitter Means Business, is a must for those wishing to look at Twitter’s growth and potential as a business tool. Grab it here, or here…it would make a great stocking stuffer! Look for more from Julio here soon!Thanks Julio…and Julio’s son…I’m honored that you included me in this project. Be sure and use the proceeds of the book to send that young man to college!

 

 

Hanging with the Citj-New Pamphleteers/New Reporters

I had the pleasure of attending a two day gathering put together by Journalism That Matters. This gathering of “new pamphleteers” numbered well over a hundred interested in, what is being called, Citizen Journalism.

Because of my interest in the subject and because of my work with this blog and Minnov8, I was anxious to learn from this passionate group of journalists and community members. In the past, I’ve never considered myself a journalist. However, as I now write more than I ever have, I find I have much in common with those that are members of the press.

This world does offer it’s own verbiage. Hey, no endeavor is complete without its own buzzwords. Citj=citizen journalism, Big J=mainstream journalists. Words that are good; aperture, community weavers, citizen, relationship, ethics, trust, quality, and sustainability. Words that are frowned upon; profit, consumer. Examples of Citizen Journalism include Twin Cities Daily Planet, the St. Louis Beacon, Hometown Focus, The Uptake, and Political Chowder.

This is no ragtag group of ultra liberal, “Hey, the man is keeping us down”, don’t trust big brother types fixated on pushing a similar agenda. These are smart, thoughtful, committed, strategic, insightful journalists concentrating on serving their communities with in-depth stories on the topics that impact those communities. They seek to be a source for the type of journalism that has been replaced in large part by the “nothing but the hits” approach to news that the Big J companies have adopted.

[Read more…]